Mar 28, 2010

Posted by aidan in writing process | 6 comments

Choosing What Not to Read

Two of the most common pieces of advice you’ll hear about writing are:

* Write more

* Read more

I’ve also read many interviews where writers say they no longer have time to keep up with other novels published in their own genre.

Sturgeon’s oft-mentioned law is that 90% of everything is crud.  These days even if you only concentrate on a particular sub-genre (e.g space opera), the amount of reading material available means that the 10% is far more than anyone has the time to read.

In the pre-Internet days it was much harder to get recommendations for books.  Now it only takes a little bit of web surfing to uncover a slew of interesting sounding books.

Add to this the amount of free online material (magazines, blogs, podcasts, discussion forums, etc).

Another factor is that the more serious you get about writing the more likely it is that you’ll make friends with other writers.  It’s only natural to want to support your friends and read their books.

I keep a file on my computer with list of books I want to read.

There are now more than 600 books on that list.

It’s no longer the case where I’ll read a book simply because I want to read it.  I have to want to read it more than I want to read a lot of other books.

I used to decide which book on my bookshelf I wanted to read first, with the understanding I would read the other books later.  I own at least a couple of hundred books I haven’t read.  Given on average I read around 50 books a year, even if I stopped buying books and going to the library, it would take me a few years to clear my backlog of books to read.

With all of the information and book recommendations available online sometimes less can be more.  The more recommendations available, the strength of each particular recommendation can diminish.  They get lost amongst all the noise.  If someone gives you a list of their 100 favorite books how likely is it you’ll read a particular book on that list versus a book they place in your hand and tell you that you have to read?

Another factor I’ve noticed is that once writers are published they tend to read less fiction and read more non-fiction.

If you’re writing science fiction or fantasy it pays to do a lot of technical or historical research.

I’m working on a novel set in a monastery in an alternate-world feudal Japan and so I’ve been reading books about the history of Japan and  a book written by a Japanese salaryman that spent a year studying to be a monk in one of Japan’s strictest Zen monasteries.

The amount of available reading material has also changed how I read.  I’m a lot less patient.  If a short story hasn’t grabbed me by the first page I move on to something else.  I’m quite happy skimming non-fiction books looking for the parts that interest me.

I’ve also noticed I’m less inclined to read novels by authors I’ve read before.

One of the reasons I read is to encounter new ideas (hence my preferences for science fiction, fantasy and non-fiction).

Of course I still try and read books by my favorite authors.  But if I enjoyed a novel by an author and it’s not one of my favorite books, well maybe I’m more likely to try something from a new author I’ve heard good things about.

There is also the consideration of timing.

Controversial new books (especially non-fiction) can get bumped up my reading list, because it’s fun to read them while others are discussing them.  There’s also the sense of not wanting to be excluded from the conversation when people are talking about books that have made a big impact, such as Harry Potter.  But it would still take a lot more than that to get me interested in reading the Twilight books though.

What you’re currently writing can also influence your choice of fiction reading.
Some writers don’t like to read works in the same genre as they’re working on because they feel they might be influenced too much.

I’ve noticed it can be distracting for me to read works in a different genre from the one I’m working on.  If I read a great dystopian monkey comedy of manners novel, that makes me want to stop my current project and write my own dystopian monkey comedy of manners.

How do you decide what you’re going to read?

  1. Hail,
    I did the maths (startling, sin’t it) once and the amount of books one can read in a lifetime is distressingly small. Predictions of us all becoming immortal super-intellects aside, I may only have a few thousand left in me.

    I read a lot of free stuff (good newspapers, journals, etc.), I don’t buy much sight unseen – I tend to stick with authors because it’s a good predictor of how good the next book is – and I read predominantly non-fiction, which I rarely read cover to cover.

    i.e.; in terms of supporting the industry, I am crap. Your way of doing stuff has merit.

    Electronically, i am placing Riddley Walker in your hand. You have to read it.

  2. Perhaps the Singularity is the only chance I have of reading a Stephanie Meyer book.

    It’s rare for me to buy a novel by a new author without having heard lots of good things about it.

    If you read a lot of writer blogs and look at award lists and recommended reading lists there are some books that get positive mention after positive mentions.

    Maybe I won’t like them, but I think they’re at least worth checking out. Recent books that fall into this category that I’m looking forward to reading include N.K Jemisin’s The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, Paolo Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl and Ken Scholes’ Lamentation.

    Thank you for the recommendation. I did try reading Riddley Walker a few years ago, but didn’t get very far. I’m not a big fan of post-apocalyptic novels (a lot of people rave about A Canticle For Leibowitz but I didn’t enjoy it at all) and I found the language off-putting. Maybe I’ll have to try again when I find the time. :-)

  3. I have a reading priority list:
    1) ARCs
    2) A classic book in a genre I want to write in
    3) Contemporary novels

    I hardly finish any book any more though.

  4. Ditto! Oh, thank heavens I’m not the only one! I regulary make prioritised lists of all the books (that I have bought) which I MUST read. The lists change all the time, but the percentage of actually read remains constant at 5% (I call that the cosmological constant).

    I choose by association: something I read sparks something which sparks memories of… and then my lovely numbered list turns into a branching, flowering bush covering the land. I’ll skim read, and not-read, and not-finish-reading, until I find the something in Sturgeon’s 10% that grabs me and I read to the end. Recent 10 percenters (and firm recommendations): Jeff Vandermeer’s Finch, McEwan’s On Chesyl Beach, Richard Bessel’s Nazism and War, Javier Marias’ Your Face Tomorrow, Jim Crace’s Being Dead, Daphne Du Maurier’s The Breakthrough, Herta Muller’s Nadirs, Iain McCalman’s Darwin’s Armada…

    It may seem as though there isn’t much SF in that list, but all of it feeds into whatever crazy SF narrative my fevered brain is currently thinking up.

  5. @Adam.

    I can understand skimming non-fiction, but it’s a shame if you’re not finding many novels that you’re inclined to finish.

  6. @Tracy.

    I have Finch at home, ready to read. I’ve heard of some of the other writers you mention, but haven’t read any of the titles.

    So much to read. :-)

Leave a Reply